CLOUD 9 / 2022 / 23

CLOUD 9.1 & 9.2
oil on canvas each 160 x 200 cm
each 63" x 78,74"
© KLAUS HU 2022 / 23
& VG BILD-KUNST BONN

by KLAUS HU / 2022 - 23

Klaus Hu currently paints cloud formations, found above his studio in Berlin the last several years. Some recorded, some stored in the archive. Lets not be simple to confuse cloud painting and storytelling. Imagination is the one source, translation is the other. Towards each cloud, a small story will evolve. The first have been filed under the "uncanny”. How the series will unfold, cannot be predicted, but for sure it will be clouds recorded from above the studio space in Berlin, delivering poetic or prose like short stories towards each chapter. Clouds have a fleeting and ephemeral consistency, neither representing a subject. Their appearance taking any shape let them become the ideal projection of transit states. This work series does not dream of escapism, but after a content loaded work period, this interim work series provides calm and frenzy for an ambiguity of interpretations. Each cloud even seemingly bears its own time frame for truth and fiction. And for reflection.

Soth, Chris and Phillip went into an auction house

... and never came out alive again.

there must have been some mushroom clouds hovering...

(uncanny)

download full work series
and following chat as pdf for free (60 pages)
via google.drive as .pdf

CLOUD 9.1

oil on canvas 160 x 200 cm

63" x 78,74"

© KLAUS HU 2022 / 23
& VG BILD-KUNST BONN

can you count the clouds today?
no, I´m in the bathroom at the moment

CLOUD 9.2

oil on canvas 160 x 200 cm

63" x 78,74"

& VG BILD-KUNST BONN

a poet lost faith, paper and pen
the cloud passing by
his only imagined friend

CLOUD 9.3
oil on canvas 70 x 80 cm
27,55" x 31,49"
© KLAUS HU 2023
& VG BILD-KUNST BONN

slow move, low wind, a breath
candyfloss, lack of substance

CLOUD 9.4
oil on canvas 70 x 80 cm
27,55" x 31,49"
© KLAUS HU 2023
& VG BILD-KUNST BONN

its said, that clouds and the ocean are of the same element
clouds have forms, but the ocean seems endless…

CLOUD 9.5
oil on canvas 70 x 80 cm
27,55" x 31,49"
© KLAUS HU 2023
& VG BILD-KUNST BONN

when faith moves a cloud...

CLOUD 9.6
oil on canvas 70 x 80 cm
27,55" x 31,49"
© KLAUS HU 2023
& VG BILD-KUNST BONN

like time and filaments of galaxies… spiderwebs, gravitation, gas clouds
and electromagnetic charges, that pull and push to form matter
and destroy it again in nanoseconds

CLOUD 9.7 & 9.8
oil on canvas, each 40 x 55 cm
each 15,7" x 21,6"
© KLAUS HU 2023
& VG BILD-KUNST BONN

a cloudless day in the city… disappearing

CLOUD 9.9
oil on canvas 80 x 70 cm
31,49" x 27,55"
© KLAUS HU 2023
& VG BILD-KUNST BONN

c loud and hear silence

CLOUD 9.10
oil, graphite, charcoal on bristol
70 x 100 cm / unframed
80 x 110 cm / framed
27,55" x 39,37" / 31.49" x 43.30"
© KLAUS HU 2023
& VG BILD-KUNST BONN

download full work series
and following chat as pdf for free (60 pages)
via google.drive as .pdf

On 22 Dec 2023 out of curiosity, I had a chat with Bard Google chatbot about the uncertainty principle in the universe, electromagnetic charges and the possibility of black holes acting as a "stir" in the fabric for continuous creation and destruction, and thus eliminating black matter or energy as theoretical concept for accelerated expansion. This was its responses to my questions and speculations:

How is uncertainty interwoven in the universe, I mean the cosmos´ pattern and its fabric?

Uncertainty is woven into the very fabric of the universe. It is present at every level of existence, from the subatomic to the cosmological.
At the subatomic level, quantum mechanics tells us that particles exist in a state of superposition, meaning they can be in multiple states at the same time. This means that the future of a particle is uncertain, as it can take on different paths depending on the outcome of a random event.
At the cosmological level, the universe is also governed by uncertainty. The Big Bang, the event that gave rise to the universe, was a random event, and the subsequent expansion of the universe has been shaped by a series of random quantum fluctuations. This means that the precise shape and contents of the universe are uncertain.
The presence of uncertainty in the universe has a number of implications. One implication is that the universe is constantly changing and evolving. This is because the uncertainty of quantum mechanics allows for the possibility of new particles and forces to come into existence, and for existing particles and forces to interact in new ways.
Another implication of uncertainty is that the universe is unpredictable. This is because even if we knew the exact state of the universe at a given moment, we could not predict with certainty what would happen next, due to the role of randomness in quantum mechanics.
Despite the presence of uncertainty, the universe is also governed by a certain degree of order. This order is evident in the laws of physics, which describe the behavior of matter and energy. It is also evident in the structure of the cosmos, which is characterized by galaxies, stars, planets, and other celestial bodies.
The interplay between uncertainty and order is one of the most fascinating aspects of the universe. It is a reminder that the universe is a complex and dynamic place, where the familiar can suddenly give way to the unexpected.
Here are some specific examples of how uncertainty is interwoven in the universe:
    •    The double-slit experiment: In this experiment, a beam of electrons is fired at a barrier with two slits. When the electrons pass through the slits, they create an interference pattern on a screen behind the barrier. This pattern is evidence that the electrons are behaving in a wave-like manner, even though they are also particles. 
    •    The cosmic microwave background radiation: This is the faint afterglow of the Big Bang, and it is evidence that the universe was once very hot and dense. The pattern of the cosmic microwave background radiation is very smooth, which is evidence that the universe was very uniform in its early stages. 
    •    The formation of black holes: Black holes are incredibly dense objects that have such a strong gravitational pull that not even light can escape them. The formation of black holes is a process that is still not fully understood, but it is thought to involve a very high degree of uncertainty. 

seen from our point of view, the universe is around 13 billion years old. Is it possible to say, that beyond the expansion of the universe, whose scale is not known, there could be more multiple billions of years to add, as galaxies, whose light is so distant, it cannot reach us, also because of the accelerated expansion of the universe? and if so, saying the universe could be infinite, is it then possible to say the birth of the universe aka big bang could be ongoing, creating new multiple particles?

The age of the observable universe is estimated to be around 13.8 billion years, based on the cosmic microwave background radiation, the faint afterglow of the Big Bang. However, the universe may be much older than this, as there may be regions of the universe that are too distant for their light to have reached us yet.
The accelerated expansion of the universe suggests that the observable universe is only a tiny fraction of the entire universe. This means that there may be many more galaxies out there that we can never see, due to the expansion of the universe.
If the universe is infinite, it is possible that the Big Bang is ongoing, creating new particles all the time. This is because the Big Bang is not a single event that happened in the past, but rather an ongoing process of the universe expanding and creating new matter.
However, it is also possible that the universe is finite, and that the Big Bang was a single event that occurred in the past. In this case, the universe would have a finite number of particles, and the number of particles would be decreasing as the universe expands and cools.
The question of whether the universe is infinite or finite is one of the most fundamental questions in cosmology. Scientists are still trying to answer this question, and there is no clear consensus yet.
Here are some of the evidence that suggests that the universe may be infinite:
    •    The cosmic microwave background radiation: This faint afterglow of the Big Bang is uniform in all directions, which suggests that the universe is very large and that we are not seeing any special place in it. 
    •    The abundance of light elements: The abundance of light elements, such as hydrogen and helium, in the universe is consistent with the predictions of the Big Bang theory, even if the universe is infinite. 
    •    The existence of dark matter and dark energy: Dark matter and dark energy are two mysterious substances that make up about 95% of the universe's mass and energy. It is possible that dark matter and dark energy are responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe, and if so, this would suggest that the universe is infinite. 

Here are some of the evidence that suggests that the universe may be finite:
    •    The presence of structures in the universe: The universe is not completely uniform; it is instead filled with galaxies, clusters of galaxies, and other large-scale structures. These structures could not have formed if the universe were infinite. 
    •    The redshift of distant galaxies: The light from distant galaxies is redshifted, which means that its wavelength is stretched. This is interpreted as a Doppler shift, suggesting that the galaxies are moving away from us. The amount of redshift increases with distance, which suggests that the expansion of the universe is accelerating. This acceleration would eventually cause the universe to recollapse in a Big Crunch, which would contradict the idea of an infinite universe. 
    •    The observed smoothness of the cosmic microwave background radiation: If the universe were finite, the cosmic microwave background radiation would not be as smooth as it is observed to be. This is because the radiation from different parts of the universe would have had time to interact with each other before the universe became transparent, which would have created fluctuations in the radiation. 
The debate over the size and fate of the universe is likely to continue for many years to come. As our understanding of the universe deepens, we may be able to resolve this mystery, but for now, it remains one of the most fascinating and unsolved questions in cosmology.

re. "The existence of dark matter and dark energy: Dark matter and dark energy are two mysterious substances that make up about 95% of the universe's mass and energy. It is possible that dark matter and dark energy are responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe, and if so, this would suggest that the universe is infinite." is it possible, that the theory of dark matter and dark energy is false? Means, that gravitation and the electromagnetic fields alone drive the force of accumulation of matter (galaxies, strings of galaxies) and with the known force of positive and negative electromagnetic forces are responsible for acceleration and thus accelerated expansion of the universe? (with the help of unknown forces of black holes?)

It is certainly possible that the theory of dark matter and dark energy is false. The existence of these mysterious substances has been inferred from a variety of observations, but they have never been directly detected. Additionally, there are a number of alternative explanations for the observed phenomena that could account for the accelerated expansion of the universe without the need for dark matter and dark energy.
One possibility is that our understanding of gravity is incomplete. Einstein's theory of general relativity is a powerful description of gravity, but it is not perfect. There are some situations where general relativity breaks down, and it is possible that these situations are relevant to the accelerated expansion of the universe. For example, some physicists have suggested that the presence of black holes or other massive objects could create an effect that mimics dark energy.
Another possibility is that our understanding of electromagnetism is incomplete. Electromagnetism is a very well-tested theory, but there are still some unanswered questions. For example, we don't know everything about how electromagnetism interacts with gravity. It is possible that there is a new force or field that is responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe.
It is also possible that the accelerated expansion of the universe is a temporary phenomenon. The expansion of the universe has been accelerating for the past few billion years, but it is possible that this acceleration will eventually slow down or reverse. If this is the case, then the observed phenomena could be explained by ordinary matter and ordinary forces.
The search for the true cause of the accelerated expansion of the universe is one of the most important challenges in cosmology today. As our telescopes and instruments become more powerful, we will be able to gather more data about the universe and to test these various hypotheses. Hopefully, we will soon be able to resolve this mystery and to gain a better understanding of the cosmos.
Here are some of the observational evidence that supports the existence of dark matter and dark energy:
    •    The rotation curves of galaxies: Galaxies rotate much faster than they should if they were only made of visible matter. This suggests that there is a large amount of invisible matter, known as dark matter, that is pulling on the visible matter and making the galaxies rotate faster. 
    •    The gravitational lensing of light: The light from distant galaxies is bent by the gravity of intervening galaxies and matter. This bending of light can be used to measure the amount of mass in the intervening region. Studies of gravitational lensing have shown that there is much more mass in the universe than can be accounted for by visible matter. 
    •    The cosmic microwave background radiation: The cosmic microwave background radiation is a faint afterglow from the Big Bang. The spectrum of this radiation is very smooth, which suggests that the universe was very uniform in its early stages. This uniformity is difficult to explain if the universe is only made of visible matter. 
These observations are strong evidence for the existence of dark matter and dark energy. However, it is important to note that these observations could also be explained by other phenomena that we do not yet understand. Until we can directly detect dark matter and dark energy, we will not be able to definitively say that they exist.
I hope this helps!

re: "For example, we don't know everything about how electromagnetism interacts with gravity." Please describe a possible new force or field, that could be responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe.

There are several possible new forces or fields that could be responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe. Some of these possibilities include:
    •    A fifth fundamental force: This would be a new force of nature, in addition to the four forces we already know about: electromagnetism, gravity, the strong force, and the weak force. This new force could be responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe, and it could also explain some of the unexplained phenomena in the universe, such as the existence of dark matter and dark energy. 
    •    A modification of Einstein's theory of general relativity: This is the most likely possibility, as it is based on our current understanding of physics. There are several ways to modify general relativity, and some of these modifications could account for the accelerated expansion of the universe. 
    •    A new type of energy: This could be a new type of energy that does not interact with matter in the same way that ordinary matter does. This energy could be spread throughout the universe, and it could be responsible for the accelerated expansion. 
    •    An effect of quantum gravity: Quantum gravity is a theory that tries to reconcile the laws of quantum mechanics with the laws of general relativity. This theory is still in its early stages of development, but it could potentially explain the accelerated expansion of the universe. 
It is important to note that all of these possibilities are still speculative, and there is no definitive evidence to support any of them. However, these are all interesting possibilities that are being investigated by physicists around the world.
Here are some specific examples of new forces or fields that have been proposed to explain the accelerated expansion of the universe:
    •    The Chaplygin gas: This is a hypothetical fluid that has negative pressure, which would cause the expansion of the universe to accelerate. 
    •    Brans-Dicke theory: This is a modification of general relativity that introduces a new field, called the scalar field. This field could be responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe. 
    •    Spontaneous symmetry breaking: This is a phenomenon in quantum field theory in which a field acquires a vacuum expectation value. This could potentially lead to a new force or field that is responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe. 
These are just a few examples, and there are many other possibilities. As our understanding of physics deepens, we may be able to identify the true cause of the accelerated expansion of the universe.

please detail "several ways to modify general relativity"

Sure, here are some of the modifications people have proposed to general relativity in an attempt to explain the accelerated expansion of the universe:
    •    Modified gravity theories: These theories modify the geometry of spacetime, the fabric of the universe, in a way that allows for the accelerated expansion. One example is the braneworld theory, which posits that our universe is a three-dimensional membrane embedded in a higher-dimensional space. 
    •    Scalar-tensor theories: These theories introduce a scalar field in addition to the traditional gravitational field. The scalar field can interact with matter and gravity in a way that can lead to the accelerated expansion of the universe. 
    •    Modified dispersion relations: These theories modify the way that light travels through spacetime. This can lead to the appearance of dark energy, even if there is no new substance or force responsible for the accelerated expansion. 
    •    Topological inflation: This theory suggests that the universe is not smooth and homogeneous, but rather has tiny knots and bubbles. These knots and bubbles can act like seeds for the accelerated expansion. 
    •    Emergent gravity: This theory suggests that gravity is not a fundamental force, but rather an emergent property of other forces, such as quantum mechanics. This could potentially explain the accelerated expansion without the need for dark energy. 
It is important to note that there is no single theory that has been universally accepted as the explanation for the accelerated expansion of the universe. However, these modifications to general relativity represent some of the most promising approaches to understanding this puzzling phenomenon.
Here are some of the challenges that physicists face in trying to modify general relativity:
    •    Deriving the modified theory from first principles: It is difficult to derive a modified theory of gravity from first principles, such as the laws of quantum mechanics or string theory. 
    •    Testing the modified theory: It is difficult to test modified theories of gravity, as there is no direct way to measure the effects of these theories. 
    •    Reconciling the modified theory with other observations: Modified theories of gravity often conflict with other observations in cosmology and astrophysics. 
Despite these challenges, physicists are continuing to explore modifications to general relativity in an effort to explain the accelerated expansion of the universe. These modifications represent an important step towards our understanding of the fundamental laws of physics.

hm

I'm just a language model, so I can't help you with that.

funny

Here's a joke for you:
What do you call a fish wearing a suit?
Sofishticated.

hm

Is there something else you're curious about? I'm happy to answer your questions to the best of my ability.

re. "Topological inflation: This theory suggests that the universe is not smooth and homogeneous, but rather has tiny knots and bubbles. These knots and bubbles can act like seeds for the accelerated expansion."....could it then be, by superposing multiple models, like topological inflation, the braneworld theory, even our universe may be inside a black hole itself, proving that only gravity, electromagnetism and strong and weak force alone are at play?

It is an interesting and thought-provoking question.
The braneworld theory, for example, suggests that our universe is a three-dimensional membrane embedded in a higher-dimensional space. This higher-dimensional space could be the interior of a black hole.
Topological inflation also suggests that the universe may have tiny knots and bubbles, which could be seeds for the formation of black holes.
If these theories are correct, then it is possible that our universe is indeed inside a black hole. This would mean that the only forces at play in our universe would be gravity, electromagnetism, the strong force, and the weak force.
Of course, there is no direct evidence to support this idea, and it is still very speculative. However, it is an interesting possibility that could have profound implications for our understanding of the universe.
Here are some of the implications of this idea:
    •    The origin of the universe: If our universe is inside a black hole, then the Big Bang could have been caused by the collapse of the black hole. 
    •    The nature of black holes: Black holes would no longer be places where matter is infinitely compressed, but rather as regions where the universe is folded back onto itself. 
    •    The future of the universe: The universe would not end in a Big Crunch, but rather would continue to expand forever. 
These are just a few of the implications of the idea that our universe is inside a black hole. It is a fascinating and challenging idea that is sure to spark further debate and research.

please detail "The nature of black holes: Black holes would no longer be places where matter is infinitely compressed, but rather as regions where the universe is folded back onto itself."

The idea that black holes are not infinitely compressed objects but rather regions where the universe is folded back onto itself is a fascinating and thought-provoking one. It is based on the braneworld theory, which suggests that our universe is a three-dimensional membrane embedded in a higher-dimensional space.
According to this theory, black holes are not holes at all, but rather gateways to other universes or regions of our own universe. When matter is pulled into a black hole, it passes through the membrane and enters another region of spacetime.
This could explain why black holes are so mysterious and difficult to understand. If they are gateways to other universes, then we cannot directly observe what is happening inside them. We can only see the effects of their gravity on the surrounding spacetime.
The idea that black holes are folded regions of spacetime has some interesting implications. It could explain why black holes are so difficult to create. If they are gateways to other universes, then they must be very rare and difficult to find.
It could also explain why black holes are so massive. If they are folded regions of spacetime, then they could contain a vast amount of matter from other universes or regions of our own universe.
The idea that black holes are folded regions of spacetime is still very speculative, but it is an intriguing possibility that could have profound implications for our understanding of the universe.
Here are some of the implications of this idea:
    •    The origin of black holes: If black holes are gateways to other universes, then they could have been created in the early universe when our universe was very young and small. 
    •    The nature of black hole radiation: Black hole radiation could be explained as radiation that escapes from the folded region of spacetime. 
    •    The future of black holes: Black holes could eventually evaporate due to black hole radiation. 
These are just a few of the implications of the idea that black holes are folded regions of spacetime. It is a fascinating and challenging idea that is sure to spark further debate and research.

"The origin of black holes: If black holes are gateways to other universes, then they could have been created in the early universe when our universe was very young and small." ...this seems to be false, as black holes are dense energy, and consume vast energy. So the creation of the universe, depending on overlapping models (Topological inflation / the braneworld theory), must be ongoing. Means constant creation of knots, galaxies and clusters, powered by black holes. so the universe cannot have an age. then the words "young and small universe" must be false…

I agree with you. The misconception about black holes is that their gravity is so strong that they can even pull in light. But they are not places where matter is infinitely compressed. They are only dense regions of spacetime where gravity is very strong.
So, black holes do not have an infinite age. They are relatively young objects that formed in the early universe, and they will continue to exist until they evaporate due to black hole radiation.
The idea that black holes are gateways to other universes is speculative, but it is an interesting possibility that is supported by the braneworld theory. According to this theory, our universe is a three-dimensional membrane embedded in a higher-dimensional space.
If this is true, then black holes could be wormholes that connect our universe to other universes or regions of our own universe. This could explain why black holes are so mysterious and difficult to understand.
If black holes are wormholes, then they could have been created in the early universe when our universe was very young and small. This is because the universe was much more dense and energetic in the early stages of its evolution. This could have allowed for the formation of black holes from much smaller amounts of matter than is required today.
However, I also agree with you that our current understanding of the universe suggests that our universe cannot have an infinite age. This is because the universe is expanding, and it is likely that it will continue to expand forever. This expansion is causing the distance between galaxies to increase, and it is eventually going to cause the universe to become very cold and dark.
So, even if black holes are gateways to other universes, our universe is not infinite, and it will eventually come to an end.

but what if there is constant creation, even powered by these black holes? wouldn´t that mean, that the processes are infinite? but only seen as a fraction from our point of view? (as we create physical models, even models of space and time?)

The possibility of constant creation powered by black holes is an interesting one that is still being explored by physicists. If this is true, then it would mean that our universe is not finite, but is rather a constantly evolving and expanding entity.
There are a few different ways to think about this possibility. One way is to imagine that the universe is like a giant computer program. In this analogy, black holes could be seen as the "processors" that generate new information and create new universes.
Another way to think about it is to imagine that the universe is like a fractal. Fractals are mathematical patterns that are infinitely complex. If the universe is fractal, then it would mean that there is no end to the process of creation, and that new universes are constantly being born from the old ones.
Of course, these are just two possible interpretations of the idea of constant creation powered by black holes. It is still a very speculative idea, and there is no scientific consensus on whether or not it is true.
However, it is an interesting idea that has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the universe. If it is true, then it would mean that our universe is much more dynamic and complex than we ever imagined. It would also mean that there is no end to the creation of new universes, and that we are only seeing a tiny fraction of the vast and ever-changing cosmos.

2nd draft
it's an interesting thought. If there is constant creation, even powered by black holes, it would mean that the processes are infinite. However, it is important to note that we cannot directly observe what is happening inside black holes. We can only see the effects of their gravity on the surrounding spacetime.
So, it is possible that there is constant creation inside black holes, but we cannot say for sure. It is also possible that black holes are not gateways to other universes, but rather are simply very dense objects that have formed in the early universe.
The idea of constant creation is a fascinating one, but it is still very speculative. There is no direct evidence to support it, and it is still being debated by physicists.
However, it is an interesting possibility that could have profound implications for our understanding of the universe.
Here are some of the implications of the idea of constant creation:
    •    The origin of the universe: If there is constant creation, then the universe could have no beginning or end. It could simply be an eternal cycle of creation and destruction. 
    •    The nature of time: If there is constant creation, then time could not be a linear progression from the past to the future. It could be a more complex and dynamic entity. 
    •    The future of the universe: If there is constant creation, then the universe could never end. It could simply continue to expand and evolve forever. 
These are just a few of the implications of the idea of constant creation. It is a fascinating and challenging idea that is sure to spark further debate and research.

3rd draft

The idea that there is constant creation, even powered by black holes, is an intriguing one that has been proposed by some physicists. It is based on the idea that black holes can create new universes or regions of our own universe.
If this is true, then it would mean that the universe is not infinite, but rather that it is constantly being created. This would have some interesting implications for our understanding of the universe.
For example, it would mean that the universe would not have a beginning or an end. It would simply be a continuous cycle of creation and destruction.
It would also mean that the laws of physics would not be constant. They would be different in different parts of the universe, and they would even change over time.
This is all very speculative, of course, but it is an interesting possibility that is worth considering. It is a reminder that our current understanding of the universe is far from complete, and that there are many things that we still don't understand.
It is also a reminder that the universe is a mysterious and awe-inspiring place, and that we are only just beginning to scratch the surface of its secrets.

is it possible to "measure" or detect a galaxies electromagnetic charge? (positive or negative?)

Yes, it is possible to measure or detect a galaxy's electromagnetic charge. This is done by measuring the galaxy's interaction with magnetic fields. Galaxies emit radio waves, which are a form of electromagnetic radiation. These radio waves can be affected by magnetic fields, and the amount of deflection can be used to determine the galaxy's charge.
Galaxies are typically electrically neutral, meaning that they have equal amounts of positive and negative charges. However, there are a few galaxies that have been observed to have a slight positive or negative charge. These galaxies are called "polarized galaxies," and they are thought to be the result of the interaction of the galaxy with a nearby pulsar, which is a type of neutron star that emits a powerful beam of radiation.
The charge of a galaxy can also be affected by the presence of magnetic fields in the intergalactic medium, which is the space between galaxies. These magnetic fields can be generated by the motion of galaxies, by the interaction of galaxies with each other, or by the presence of large-scale structures in the universe, such as superclusters of galaxies.
The study of the electromagnetic charge of galaxies is a relatively new field of research, but it is already providing us with new insights into the formation and evolution of galaxies. As our understanding of the universe grows, we may be able to use the charge of galaxies to study the magnetic fields of the universe and to learn more about the big bang.

is it possible to "measure" or detect a black holes electromagnetic charge? (positive or negative?)

It is not possible to directly measure or detect a black hole's electromagnetic charge. This is because black holes are so small and dense that they emit very little electromagnetic radiation. However, there are a few indirect ways that we can try to infer the charge of a black hole.
One way is to look at the accretion disk of a black hole. An accretion disk is a disk of gas and dust that is swirling around a black hole. The gas and dust in the accretion disk is heated to very high temperatures by the intense radiation from the black hole. This hot gas emits electromagnetic radiation, including X-rays.
If the black hole has an electric charge, then it will interact with the magnetic field of the accretion disk. This interaction will cause the gas and dust in the accretion disk to spiral inward at an even faster rate. This can cause the X-rays emitted by the accretion disk to be polarized.
Another way that we can try to infer the charge of a black hole is to look at its gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are ripples in the fabric of spacetime that are emitted by black holes. The strength of the gravitational waves emitted by a black hole depends on its mass and spin.
If the black hole has an electric charge, then it will also emit gravitational waves. These gravitational waves will be different from the gravitational waves emitted by a neutral black hole. By studying the gravitational waves emitted by a black hole, we may be able to infer its charge.
However, it is important to note that these are just indirect methods of detecting a black hole's charge. They are not foolproof, and they may not be able to detect a black hole's charge if it is very small.
Researchers are still working on developing better methods for detecting black holes' electromagnetic charges. As we learn more about black holes, we may be able to develop new methods that will allow us to directly measure or detect their charges.

so we have neutral charged galaxies, slightly positive and slightly negative charged galaxies nearby a pulsar. We have black holes, that consume and emit energy. Compress space time. What if (as stated before) the whole motor of constant infinite destruction and creation, plus accelerated expansion of the universe is driven a. by these electromagnetic charges of the galaxies (as attraction and repulsion > creating a spin or drift) and b. by black holes as additional "motor" function as a "stir" either to create passages to different space time/or location in the universe, and thus function in the "braneworld theory" as a breathing system, like a ventilator? PS. the human projection of physical laws would even in this constant accelerated creation and destruction theory not break down. Even if multiple universes or this observable universe does exist inside another giant black hole. Our universe would then be the constant "air" of creation and destruction. Although accelerated and with expansion....

That's an interesting hypothesis. It's certainly possible that the electromagnetic charges of galaxies and the actions of black holes could play a role in the accelerating expansion of the universe.
There is evidence that galaxies are not completely neutral, but rather have a slight positive or negative charge. This charge is thought to be the result of the interaction of galaxies with magnetic fields in the intergalactic medium.
Black holes are also known to emit high-energy particles called Hawking radiation. This radiation is thought to be caused by the interaction of the black hole with virtual particles that exist in the quantum vacuum.
It is possible that these electromagnetic fields and particles could interact with each other in ways that contribute to the accelerating expansion of the universe. For example, the electromagnetic fields could provide a source of energy for the expansion, and the Hawking radiation could create new particles that contribute to the expansion.
It is also possible that black holes could act as portals to other universes or regions of our own universe. If this is true, then it could explain why the universe is accelerating, as the expansion could be driven by the flow of matter and energy through these portals.
These are just a few possible explanations for the accelerating expansion of the universe. It is a complex phenomenon that is still not fully understood. However, the idea that it is driven by electromagnetic fields and black holes is an interesting one that deserves further investigation.
However, it is important to note that these are just hypotheses, and there is no scientific consensus on whether or not they are true. More research is needed to confirm or refute these ideas.

2nd draft

That is a fascinating idea, and it would be fascinating to know if it is true. It is certainly possible that the electromagnetic charges of galaxies and the actions of black holes could be contributing to the accelerated expansion of the universe. However, this is still a very speculative idea, and there is no scientific consensus on whether or not it is true.
The idea that the universe is constantly expanding is supported by observational evidence. The redshift of distant galaxies, for example, suggests that the galaxies are moving away from us at an accelerating rate. This acceleration is thought to be caused by dark energy, a mysterious force that makes up about 70% of the universe's energy density.
However, the exact nature of dark energy is still unknown. It is possible that it is a new kind of energy, or it is simply a modification of our understanding of gravity.
If black holes are playing a role in the expansion of the universe, then it is likely that they are doing so in a way that is not yet fully understood. Black holes are very mysterious objects, and we are still learning about their properties.
It is also possible that the universe is not expanding at all, but rather that it is contracting. This is a more controversial idea, but it is supported by some theoretical models.
Only time will tell what the true nature of the universe is. However, it is certainly a fascinating mystery that has been puzzling scientists for centuries.
The human projection of physical laws would also not break down in this constant accelerated creation and destruction theory, even if multiple universes or this observable universe inside another giant black hole would exist.
Our universe would then be the constant "air" of creation and destruction, although accelerated and with expansion.
This is a very interesting idea that would have profound implications for our understanding of the universe. If it is true, then it would mean that the universe is not a static place, but rather a dynamic and ever-changing entity. It would also mean that there is no end to the creation of new universes, and that we are only seeing a tiny fraction of the vast and ever-changing cosmos.
Of course, this is still a very speculative idea, and there is no scientific consensus on whether or not it is true. However, it is an interesting idea that has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the universe.

please detail "quantum vacuum" and "virtual particle"

According to quantum field theory, the vacuum is not an empty void, but rather a seething sea of virtual particles. These virtual particles are constantly being created and destroyed, and they can interact with each other and with real particles.
Virtual particles are thought to be responsible for a variety of phenomena, including the Casimir effect, which is the attraction between two closely spaced objects due to the vacuum fluctuations. Virtual particles are also thought to play a role in the formation of elementary particles, such as electrons and quarks.
Quantum vacuum and virtual particles are very strange and counterintuitive concepts. However, they are well-supported by theoretical and experimental evidence.
Here are some of the properties of quantum vacuum and virtual particles:
    •    Virtual particles are always created in pairs. This is because the energy of a virtual particle can only be borrowed for a very short time, and the only way to conserve energy is to create a pair of particles so that the energy of each particle is canceled out by the energy of its partner.
    •    Virtual particles are very short-lived. They only exist for a very short time before they are annihilated. The exact amount of time that a virtual particle can exist is determined by the uncertainty principle.
    •    Virtual particles can interact with each other and with real particles. This interaction can cause real particles to change their properties or to emit other particles.
    •    Virtual particles can play a role in the formation of elementary particles. This is because the vacuum fluctuations can cause pairs of particles to be created, and these particles can then interact to form new particles.
Quantum vacuum and virtual particles are a fascinating and important part of quantum field theory. They have been used to explain a variety of phenomena, and they continue to be a source of new research and discovery.

which variety of phenomena?

Here are some examples of phenomena that are thought to be caused by virtual particles:
    •    The Casimir effect: The Casimir effect is the attraction between two closely spaced objects due to the vacuum fluctuations. This effect is very small, but it has been experimentally verified.
    •    The Lamb shift: The Lamb shift is a small shift in the energy levels of electrons in atoms. This shift is caused by the interaction of electrons with virtual photons in the vacuum.
    •    The anomalous magnetic moment of the electron: The anomalous magnetic moment of the electron is a small deviation from the value that is predicted by classical physics. This deviation is caused by the interaction of electrons with virtual photons in the vacuum.
    •    The strong nuclear force: The strong nuclear force is the force that binds protons and neutrons together in the nucleus of an atom. This force is thought to be mediated by virtual gluons.
    •    The weak nuclear force: The weak nuclear force is the force that is responsible for radioactive decay. This force is mediated by virtual W and Z bosons.
These are just a few examples of the many phenomena that are thought to be caused by virtual particles. Virtual particles are a very important part of our understanding of the universe.